Manuscript checks for peer review

See what needs attention in every manuscript.

RevieWell finds the parts of a manuscript to review and shows them with their related passages.

  • Checks organized by reporting guidelineFind passages related to the reporting items for each study design.
  • Every finding linked to its sourceOpen a finding to jump to the relevant passage in the manuscript.
  • A shared record for editors and reviewersReview findings, write an assessment and export the report.
Request a demo See the reviewer's view

The review of one sample manuscript. RevieWell extracts the text, checks the Abstract against the Methods (12 and 24 weeks for the primary outcome) and the Results against Table 1 (512 and 521 participants), and runs nine checks that return five findings. The reviewer confirms each finding, asks the authors, or dismisses it, and the decisions go to the report. The manuscript stays unchanged.

Compare two passages

See a finding as a reviewer does: the relevant passage in context, followed by a decision to confirm it, ask the authors to clarify, or dismiss it. Step through five findings in the sample manuscript.

Manuscript

Home-based telemonitoring versus usual care for uncontrolled hypertension: a randomized trial

Results

A total of 512 participants were included in the analysis. Systolic blood pressure decreased in both groups. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1.

Table 1. Baseline characteristics

GroupParticipants
Telemonitoring260
Usual care261
Total521
Finding 1 of 5

Participant count differs

Major · Numeric consistency · Cross-section check

Results reports 512, Table 1 totals 521.

Which figure is correct, 512 or 521? The flow diagram and Table 1 should agree.

0 Confirmed · 0 Clarification requested · 0 Dismissed · 5 Open

What a run checks

Nine checks. We include a check only after evaluating it on real manuscripts.

Turn off a check to see which findings it would leave out of the analysis.

Checks don’t score a manuscript. Each finding is a prompt for review, not a verdict.

How a review runs

See the path from upload and AI analysis to the reviewer’s judgment and the report.

Walk through a review →
  1. 1.0

    Upload

    DOCX or text-based PDF. Scanned PDFs are not supported yet.

  2. 2.0

    Run

    The analysis extracts claims and supporting passages and ties them to this version of the manuscript.

  3. 3.0

    Decide

    Reviewers confirm a finding, ask the authors to clarify, or dismiss it.

  4. 4.0

    Export

    The report records the manuscript version, criteria, source passages and decisions.

What a review produces

A draft assessment based only on findings the reviewer confirmed, plus a report recording the manuscript version, criteria and source passages.

The review report for the sample manuscript: title, reviewer, a tally of confirmed, clarification, dismissed and open findings, then the list of findings.
Sample review report · Analysis 3 · Criteria 2026.2 · Sample data

What AI does—and what reviewers decide

RevieWell lays out the review items and the evidence, so editors and reviewers can judge the work.

Does

  • Extracts claims and the passages that support them
  • Locates passages, tables and figures
  • Compares numbers across sections
  • Finds passages related to reporting items
  • Flags information it could not find

Never

  • Does not judge novelty or importance
  • Does not score or rank manuscripts
  • Does not write the review
  • Does not recommend acceptance or rejection
  • Does not replace the reviewer

RevieWell helps reviewers examine manuscripts. Reviewers make the judgments.

Reporting guideline checklist

  • 2 Trial registration review needed
  • 18 Allocation concealment mechanism insufficient evidence
  • 22 Participant flow, including flow diagram review needed
  • 26 Numbers analysed, outcomes and estimation review needed
  • 27 Harms review needed

Zero data retention (ZDR)

RevieWell sends manuscript text to an AI model to run the checks. Under a zero data retention agreement, the model provider retains no data after returning the results.

PlannedTo confirm

Sent to the provider
The manuscript text, for one analysis run
Kept by the provider
Nothing. Neither the text nor the model’s answers are stored.
Used to train a model
Never

This applies to the AI provider. RevieWell stores the uploaded file in your workspace so reviewers can access it. The retention period has not yet been set.

For journals and research organizations

See how RevieWell supports manuscript review.

Try the demo, from AI-assisted review to an expert’s assessment and the report.

Pilot

  • An invitation-only pilot is under consideration; its availability and details are not yet confirmed.
  • The proposed scope includes manuscript intake, analysis, human review, editorial assessment and record export.
  • The schedule and how to take part will be announced later.
Request a demo